Section 508 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Is your website compliant? Most public-sector sites aren't.

Public entities are required to make digital services accessible, and enforcement is real. The Department of Justice's rule for state and local government web content sets WCAG 2.1 AA as the standard, federal buyers must purchase accessible technology under Section 508, and complaints against non-compliant public websites are routine. Most sites fail dozens of criteria without anyone knowing until a demand letter arrives.

What lands on your desk.

  • Full WCAG 2.1 AA audit report with locations and screenshots
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap
  • Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) on request
  • Post-remediation verification and conformance statement
  • Thirty-minute findings walkthrough with your team

Three shapes, each quoted as one fixed price.

  • Audit + report, single site
    Findings, roadmap, and walkthrough
    2–3 weeks
  • Audit + full remediation
    We fix it and retest to verified conformance
    4–8 weeks
  • Annual monitoring and re-verification
    Catches what a redesign or a plugin update breaks
    Ongoing

Pricing. Fixed price, quoted before we start. Most engagements are sized to fit small-purchase and three-quote authority.

Senior-led, local, and fast — our AI-accelerated audit platform delivers in weeks what national firms quote in quarters. The person who scopes your audit is the person who performs it.

What standard do you test against?

WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA — what the Department of Justice's rule for state and local government web content references, and what the Revised Section 508 standards incorporate. We also flag 2.2-only failures, such as target size and focus not obscured, in an advisory section so a later standards move does not surprise you.

Is this just an automated scanner report?

No, and that distinction is the product. Automated tooling catches roughly a third of real issues, so it does the mechanical pass — every page, desktop and mobile breakpoints, version-pinned rules — and a person reviews every criterion that requires human judgment. We never mark a judgment criterion as passing on automated evidence alone. An ACR that claims support for captions because a scanner did not error is exactly what agency reviewers reject.

What is an ACR, and do we need one?

An Accessibility Conformance Report is the completed ITI VPAT template: every applicable criterion marked Supports, Partially Supports, Does Not Support, or Not Applicable, with remarks. Public entities usually need the audit and the remediation roadmap; vendors selling into government need the ACR itself. We produce either.

How long does it take?

Two to three weeks for the audit and report on a single site, and four to eight weeks when we also do the remediation. Rush turnaround is available when something is already on a deadline — tell us the date on the first call.

Can our current web vendor do the fixes?

Yes, and the report is written so they can. Every finding names the page, the element, and the specific change, in language a third-party developer can execute without calling us. Handing it off is a legitimate outcome; we would rather be the firm that told you the truth than the only one who can act on it.

What does the free preview scan cover?

Five findings on one page of your site, at desktop and mobile widths, with a screenshot of each — enough to see what an auditor would see. Call or email and we will run it; there is no form and no obligation.

See what an auditor would see — free.

We will run a complimentary five-finding preview scan of your site, no obligation, so you can see exactly what an auditor — or a plaintiff's firm — would find first. Call or email and we will send it.

No form, no obligation · Five findings, desktop and mobile, with screenshots